Skip to main content

Research publications repository

    • čeština
    • English
  • English 
    • čeština
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   CU Research Publications Repository
  • Fakulty
  • Faculty of Education
  • View Item
  • CU Research Publications Repository
  • Fakulty
  • Faculty of Education
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Network analysis of additional clinical features of (Internet) gaming disorder

original article
Creative Commons License IconCreative Commons BY Icon
published version
  • no other version
Thumbnail
File can be accessed.Get publication
Author
Martoncik, Marcel
Adamkovič, Matúš
Ropovik, IvanORCiD Profile - 0000-0001-5222-1233WoS Profile - J-7404-2015Scopus Profile - 56095404500
Publication date
2024
Published in
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Volume / Issue
33 (2)
ISBN / ISSN
ISSN: 1049-8931
ISBN / ISSN
eISSN: 1557-0657
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Faculty of Education

This publication has a published version with DOI 10.1002/mpr.2021

Abstract
ObjectivesThere are dozens of screening instruments purporting to measure the (Internet) gaming disorder (IGD/GD). The two prominent diagnostic manuals, DSM-5 and ICD-11, list several additional diagnostic or clinical features and problems (e.g., neglect of sleep, neglect of daily duties, health deterioration) that should co-occur or be caused by the IGD/GD. It remains unclear how specific IGD/GD operationalizations (different screening scales) are related to these functional impairments.MethodsTo explore this, data on six measures of IGD/GD (IGDS9-SF, GDSS, GDT, GAMES test, two self-assessments) and 18 additional diagnostic features were collected from a sample of 1009 players who play digital games at least 13 h per week. A network approach was utilized to determine which operationalization is most strongly associated with functional impairment.ResultsIn most of the networks, IGD/GD consistently emerged as the most central node.ConclusionThe similar centrality of IGD/GD, irrespective of its definition (DSM-5 or ICD-11) or operationalization, provides support for the valid comparison or synthesis of results from studies that used instruments coming from both DSM-5 and ICD-11 ontologies, but only if the goal is to evaluate IGD/GD relationships to other phenomena, not the relationships between the symptoms themselves.
Keywords
diagnostic, functional impairment, gaming disorder, network analysis, network approach,
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/2514
Show publication in other systems
WOS:001231138800001
SCOPUS:2-s2.0-85194407703
PUBMED:38800951
License

Full text of this result is licensed under: Creative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 International

Show license terms

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-publication-version-

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

About Repository

About This RepositoryResearch outputs typologyRequired metadataDisclaimerCC Linceses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV