https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/900 2026-04-30T18:58:02Z 2026-04-30T18:58:02Z Antoš, Marek Horák, Filip https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/3750 2026-04-28T01:00:34Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Unwritten Rules in the Czech Constitutional Law: A Functional Analysis Antoš, Marek; Horák, Filip Unwritten rules are an essential and inherent aspect of any constitutional system, including that of the Czech Republic. However, there are significant differences in opinions regarding their character and importance for the functioning of Czech constitutional law. As a result, the current academic discussion results in persistent uncertainty about what unwritten rules actually are, which term should be used to describe them, and what status they should be assigned within the constitutional legal framework. This article employs the method of functional analysis to identify and define three distinct constitutional legal constructs. Although these constructs share certain common features (unwritten nature, usus longaevus, opinio necessitatis, and relevance to the functioning of the constitutional system), they differ in other respects, with each fulfilling a unique role in the Czech constitutional framework. The first construct, referred to as constitutional custom, has a norm-creating function, enabling it to independently establish new constitutional norms. The second construct, established constitutional practice, is relevant for interpreting the constitution and serves an interpretive and argumentative function by solidifying one of the originally pluralistic interpretations of the written provisions of the constitution. Lastly, the third identified construct, referred to as constitutional convention, has a preventive and moderating function. It is not legally binding or judicially enforceable. However, it can be effectively enforced through extra-legal, typically political, mechanisms. We believe that distinguishing these three separate constructs with their differing functions will help clarify the existing ambiguities surrounding unwritten rules (not only) in Czech constitutional law and prevent potential issues arising from the substitution or hybridisation of these constructs.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Koldinská, Kristina https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/3747 2026-04-25T01:00:27Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Long-Term Care: Not a Nightmare in the EU? Koldinská, Kristina Koldinská, Kristina; Strban, Grega; Kun, Attila; Wujczyk, Marcin This chapter explores the current situation in long-term care-be it the need of long-term care and the situation in providing it-in Europe, it provides a comparison of long term care insurance systems in countries which have introduced it. An example of an interesting legislation, which has been recently adopted in Italy, is shortly commented.

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z Málek, Ondřej https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/3727 2026-04-03T01:00:14Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Systém právních prostředků ochrany při placení daní Málek, Ondřej

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z Střeleček, Tomáš Macková, Alena Sedláček, Miroslav Zahradníková, Radka Navrátil, Petr Janoušková, Anežka https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/3510 2026-02-20T02:00:16Z 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z

Metodika optimálního řešení civilních soudních sporů o peněžitá plnění Střeleček, Tomáš; Macková, Alena; Sedláček, Miroslav; Zahradníková, Radka; Navrátil, Petr; Janoušková, Anežka Uvedená metodika představuje optimální model řešení soudního sporu o peněžité plnění co do délky a co do počtu procesních úkonů (a jejich druhu) vzhledem k jejich hodnotě se zřetelem k nákladům těchto procesních úkonů (Metodika optimálního řešení civilních soudních sporů o peněžitá plnění).; The methodology represents an optimal model for resolving a litigation over monetary claims in terms of duration and number of procedural steps (and their type) in relation to their value, taking into account the costs of these procedural steps (Methodology for the optimal resolution of civil litigation over monetary claims).

2025-01-01T00:00:00Z